Skip to content
-
Subscribe to our newsletter & never miss our best posts. Subscribe Now!
  • https://www.facebook.com/
  • https://twitter.com/
  • https://t.me/
  • https://www.instagram.com/
  • https://youtube.com/
Diskrit News
Diskrit News
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
Subscribe
Close

Search

Uncategorized

Amendments to FCRA Rules Spark Controversy, Congress Calls for Withdrawal

June 26, 2026 2 Min Read
0

NEW DELHI: Congress leader KC Venugopal has termed the recent amendments to the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) rules as measures that are intended “not to regulate but to strangulate” independent civil society. Venugopal made this statement in a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday, urging the government to retract these modifications.

He labeled the newly introduced rules an “overt and systemic assault on India’s civil society,” cautioning that they would have detrimental financial and operational effects on non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that provide essential services to marginalized communities across the country.

In a similar vein, CPM MP John Brittas has voiced his concerns by writing to Union Home Minister Amit Shah, also demanding the retraction of these rules.

Venugopal highlighted that these amendments appear to compensate for the withdrawal of the FCRA bill during the recent Budget session of Parliament. He expressed that if these rules are accepted, they would transform independent civil society into a “terrified government-controlled echo chamber.”

Concerns Over Government Restrictions

The Congress MP criticized specific provisions in the rules, which require NGOs to select their activities from a rigid, government-mandated list and impose restrictions on their operational regions. He labeled the imposition of a separate fee for each additional state or category as “nothing short of an administrative toll tax designed to discourage pan-India social work.”

Brittas also raised objections regarding the inclusion of the term “proselytisation” in connection with religious activities, noting that it lacks a clear definition in the FCRA or in the recent amendments. He criticized the expanded disclosure requirements imposed on FCRA-registered organizations, warning that it would extend beyond mere financial accountability and lead to an “extensive compliance and surveillance architecture.”

Author

Diskrit News Editor

Follow Me
Other Articles
Previous

CBI Launches Nationwide Operation Against Digital Arrest Scams

Next

भारतीय रेलवे ने खाद्य विक्रेता पर 1 लाख रुपये का जुर्माना लगाया

No Comment! Be the first one.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • US Negotiators Meet Putin Amid Ukraine Peace Efforts
  • Katie Taylor Receives Heartfelt Tributes After Triumphant Farewell
  • Anubhav Sinha Commends Success of Mirzapur and Hanuman Ansh
  • Young Man Invests Life Savings in Colombian Jungle, Not Property
  • Nepal’s Hydropower Dependency Faces Challenges Post-Floods

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • September 2026
  • June 2026

Categories

  • Community
  • Entertainment
  • International News
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Uncategorized